For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a buddy - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of composing, however it's likewise a bit repeated, and really verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, because rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can purchase any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody developing one in anybody's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, created by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the product is planned as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He wants to expand his variety, producing various categories such as sci-fi, and possibly using an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - selling AI-generated products to human clients.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, lespoetesbizarres.free.fr you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we actually indicate human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe the use of generative AI for creative purposes need to be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without approval should be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be very powerful but let's build it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually chosen to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use developers' material on the internet to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also highly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for forum.altaycoins.com Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening among its finest performing industries on the vague promise of development."

A government representative stated: "No relocation will be made until we are definitely confident we have a practical plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to help them accredit their material, access to high-quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI plan, a national data library consisting of public information from a vast array of sources will likewise be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the security of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector required to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to want the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a number of claims versus AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the web without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of elements which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training data and whether it need to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

claims that it established its innovation for a portion of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and wiki.rrtn.org it can be quite challenging to check out in parts since it's so long-winded.

But given how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm unsure how long I can remain positive that my substantially slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.