For Christmas I got an intriguing gift from a buddy - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was totally written by AI, pyra-handheld.com with a few easy prompts about me provided by my pal Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of composing, however it's likewise a bit repeated, and really verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's prompts in collecting information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, considering that rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can purchase any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody developing one in any person's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is planned as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold further.

He wishes to expand his range, producing different categories such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - selling AI-generated items to human customers.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are discussing data here, we in fact mean human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and larsaluarna.se they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for innovative purposes ought to be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without approval need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really effective but let's construct it morally and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have selected to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to use creators' content on the internet to help develop their models, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise strongly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its finest performing industries on the unclear promise of growth."

A government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made up until we are absolutely confident we have a practical plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to help them license their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI plan, a nationwide information library including public data from a large range of sources will also be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the security of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a variety of suits against AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, systemcheck-wiki.de and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of elements which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training data and whether it should be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the most downloaded complimentary app on US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for a portion of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

As for me and king-wifi.win a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It is complete of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But given how rapidly the tech is developing, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr I'm not sure how long I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and akropolistravel.com editing skills, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.